But what of the natural environment? The benefits to the
community of a healthy natural environment are well documented. Of what value
is a healthy economy if we have an unhealthy population?
Pakenham (Barry Plant Real Estate) |
In 1999, our federal government estimated Australia’s
population to reach 23 million by 2050. Here we are more than 30 years away
from the middle of the century and our population is already 25 million! Current
estimates by demographers suggest that by 2050 our population should be more
like 40 million. LINK
All current environmental indicators are recording
deterioration of Australia’s natural environment. LINK
Most leading ecologists suggest that factors associated with
population growth – urbanization, land clearing, atmospheric pollution,
degraded waterways, etc – is one of the leading causes of the loss of biodiversity.
Weebar Rd Drouin |
Melbourne is Australia’s fastest growing city and on current
trends is set to have a greater population than Sydney within 8 years. Concerns
are being expressed about its ability to feed itself with continued loss of
arable land due to urban sprawl. LINK
Melbourne’s population is set to be greater than Sydney’s within 8 years. Only
about 6% of Australia’s total land mass is considered suitable for food
production.
Urban sprawl is
economically, ecologically and socially damaging. Somehow, we need to strike a balance and to
explore ways and means of maintaining a more sustainable expansion of our
population centres.
Some links for further reading...
New developments to contain a proportion of multi-unit
structures? (58% of new developments in
NSW are for townhouses or apartments. In Victoria, this figure is just 39%)
LINK
More readily attainable solar power and hot water? LINK
More readily accessible, convenient and integrated pedestrian
and bicycle paths? LINK
Greater encouragement to construct passive solar developments?
LINK
Integrated wetland designs? LINK
Less concrete, more greenery? LINK
Community gardens? LINK
No comments:
Post a Comment