If you are a climate change denier and don’t believe our planet is warming up, or if you don’t believe the science behind the reason for the 1·6°C rise in global temperature anomaly since 1900, or if you don’t believe that the disappearing glaciers, bleaching corals, increased severity and frequency of bushfires and floods, has anything to do with climate change, you need read no further; you don’t need to know what net-zero is.
The current federal Labor Government has a policy that legislates “net-zero emissions by 2050 with a 2035 target of reducing emissions by 62-70% below 2005 levels”.
On the 4th November, The Nationals announced they do not support net-zero and will “Unleash all our energy, including coal, gas, nuclear and renewables”.
On Thursday 13th November, Susan Ley, leader of the federal Liberal Party announced “We are not pursuing net-zero, we are pursuing energy affordability and emissions reduction”.
The Nationals and some Liberals point out that Australia contributes just over 1% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions whereas China for example contributes almost 30%. The flaw in this argument is that we sell nearly 90% of the coal and gas we mine to China and other high contributing countries. We sometimes even buy some of it back for domestic use! On a per capita basis, we are one of the highest emitters of greenhouse gases in the world.
Greenhouse gases - particularly carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide - trapped in the atmosphere are overheating the planet. To slow down global warming, the science tells us that we need not only to remove these gasses from the atmosphere but most of all we must stop emitting them.
![]() |
Most of Australia’s 15 operational coal power stations are
ageing and are planned to be phased out by 2038 – Loy Yang Power Station |
Net-zero does NOT mean all greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere are eliminated. We will never achieve that. Net-zero is simply the condition where there is a balance between the gases being emitted into the atmosphere and those being extracted. Scientists believe this will stabilize global warming to somewhere less than 2°C above pre-industrial conditions.
Trees and other plants remove carbon dioxide from the air naturally but we will never be able to plant enough trees to achieve net-zero without other strategies. Soils naturally absorb carbon but agricultural practices often make this natural process an unreliable means of extraction.
![]() |
Worldwide, devastating wild fires are on the increase – Grantville
NCR 2019 |
There are several technological means of extraction that are being examined – direct air capture, biomass removal and storage, carbon mineralization, ocean-based systems (sea-grass and mangrove forests, etc.) – but again, these methods on their own are nowhere near enough to achieve net-zero.
If climate change is to be mitigated, net-zero by 2050 would seem to be a minimal prerequisite. We will never achieve net-zero without drastically cutting our use of fossil fuels. Let’s get real about this.


.jpg)
